Government use of conspiracy theory: Operation INFEKTION
A future common theme on this blog will be that governments don’t just partake in conspiracies, but they also create and amplify conspiracy theories. Note the difference here. The former is legal term about individuals colluding in secret; while the latter pertains to a narrative about these collusions. One is ontological to do with the world; while the other is epistemic to do with beliefs about the world.
There are various reasons why governments would need to create a belief in conspiracy. Sometimes it is to cover up black projects or intelligence failures, i.e. covering up real conspiracies. Other times the conspiracies are created as offensive weapons against some international actor, i.e. creating fake conspiracies. For the moment, I’d like to discuss the aforementioned reason from a case that is in actual scholarly literature: Operation INFEKTION, which was the Soviet disinformation campaign to pin the origin of AIDS on the USA.
- To discredit the United states by falsely claiming that AIDS originated in CIA-Pentagon experiments.
- To discourage undesirable political contact with Westerners by portraying them as potential carriers of the disease.
- To create pressure for removal of US military bases overseas on the grounds the US service personnel spread AIDS.
- To undermine US credibility in the Third World by maintaining that hypotheses about the African origin of AIDS are an example of Western, and especially American, racism, and;
- To divert attention from Soviet research on biological warfare and genetic engineering and to neutralize accusations that the Soviet Union has used biochemical agents in Asia.
Notice the two wider themes here of using conspiracy theory. (1) to (4) are all examples of undermining the ethos or moral stature of some actor or groups. (5) is an example of diverting attention away from an actual conspiracy. These twin themes of undermining ethos and diverting attention from actual conspiracies will arise again in future posts about government use of disinformation. Also, when I say ethos, I mean in the rhetorical sense. To undermine someone’s ethos in rhetoric is to undermine their character. This is important in rhetoric, as building rapport with the audience by appealing to one’s character and moral stature is one of the foundations for a rhetorical speech.
- disinformation can be sophisticated. It can use individuals that people trust (like scientists), and can dress itself up with reasonable arguments.
- disinformation campaigns can use multiple sources (radio, newspapers, pamphlets).
- disinformation campaigns will try to hide the original sources. Once the campaign is in the open, they may switch to sources that their targets may trust (in this case, domestic newspapers). In rhetoric this is a combination of using kairos (the opportune moment to switch sources), combined with exploiting ethos (sources people trust).
Godson also has a lengthy paragraph on how the AIDS campaign was, “a diversionary tactic against claims that the Soviet Union has used biochemical weapons in Cambodia, Laos, and Afghanistan and is engaged in genetic-weapon research.” The first claim about chemical weapons pertains to Yellow Rain. Those interested in disinformation should also read that Wikipedia article on Yellow Rain for a possible similar campaign conducted by the USA. The second claim about genetic-weapons pertains to US attempts to undermine Soviet bioweapons research via UN arms control treaties (Godson quotes a State Department report here). Godson states that one of the aims was to “muddle the debate” between bio-chemical weapons and AIDS.
So finishing up, we have the two aims of government use of conspiracy theory:
- To undermine ethos, and;
- To divert attention away from actual conspiracies.
We also have some general properties of these disinformation campaigns:
- They can be epistemologically sophisticated.
- The sources will change themselves according to the opportune moment for spreading the disinformation.
- They will take into consideration the targets of the campaign, and will use sources that the target trusts.
Now, true-believing conspiracy theorists might state something along the lines of, “Yeah, but how do we know this Operation happened? It could be a conspiracy theory about a conspiracy theory.” The answer to this, is that it actually happened. You can look up old news archives and find the disinformation spread in actual newspapers. There are also multiple corroborating sources that this event occurred, including sources from the Russian parliament and members of the East German Stasi admitting to the campaign. Godson has 26 footnotes to his essay, most of which are primary sources. I will endeavour to upload a scan of this essay in the future.
- Pope’s resignation sparks conspiracy theories… (telegraph.co.uk)
- New Winger Conspiracy Theory Takes Flight (talkingpointsmemo.com)
- Crazy Michele Bachmann Still Spouting Conspiracy Theories (theageofblasphemy.wordpress.com)
- There’s a sucker born every minute (and most of them end up listening to right wing talk radio) (digbysblog.blogspot.com)
- Now, the Pope Benedict Conspiracy Theories (newser.com)
- Are conspiracy theories becoming too popular? (lunaticoutpost.com)
- 5 Things I’ve noticed about… 9/11 Conspiracy Theories (theageofblasphemy.wordpress.com)
- 10 Hilariously Bad Conspiracy Theories (listverse.com)
- In Conspiracy Theory Women Have No Agency (omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com)